Comments on: ASP.Net MVC Framework leads you to extension method heaven

By: traslochi milano

traslochi milano — Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:51:24 +0000

That is really very good article.Thanks for sharing this information.

By: adamoerikom

adamoerikom — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:31:18 +0000

Stunning blog and good article. High 5 for u man !

By: queroeropoo

queroeropoo — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:23:01 +0000

Good information to me.

By: amenodimeno

amenodimeno — Wed, 05 Aug 2009 23:22:04 +0000

Good story for me but please more details.

By: amenodimeno

amenodimeno — Fri, 31 Jul 2009 17:57:54 +0000

That’s good man, keep it going.

By: romonoeroetoko

romonoeroetoko — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:50:51 +0000

Your news is a cool stuff man, keep it going.

By: romonoeroetoko

romonoeroetoko — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:21:21 +0000

Hm that sounds good but I would like to know more details.

By: Yuri

Yuri — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:37:47 +0000

And I liked, will be looking at your site.

By: Why I changed my mind about Extension Methods - James Newton-King

Why I changed my mind about Extension Methods - James Newton-King — Mon, 04 Feb 2008 07:33:28 +0000

[...] ASP.Net MVC Framework leads you to extension method heaven .comment, .commentowner { padding-top:10px; padding-bottom: 5px; border-top: #ccc 1px solid; } .commentcontent { font-size:1.05em; line-height: 1.6 !important; } .commentcontent p, .commentcontent dt, .commentcontent dd, .commentcontent li, .commentcontent .bodytext { line-height: 1.6; } .commentowner .commentname { font-style:italic } .commentpending { display: block; padding-top: 5px; padding-bottom: 10px; } [...]

By: richardbushnell

richardbushnell — Thu, 13 Dec 2007 06:43:18 +0000

Hi Rob,

>>I don’t think MS is forcing anyone to do anything to be honest – in fact Scott struck that tone on his first post about it where he states pretty clearly that MVC is an alternative only.<<

I looked up Scott’s post. It also says:

“You can use .ASPX, .ASCX and .MASTER files and ASP.NET AJAX to create your ASP.NET MVC Views. Non-UI features in ASP.NET today like Forms Authentication, Windows Authentication, Membership, Roles, Url Authorization, Caching, Session State, Profiles, Health Monitoring, Configuration, Compilation, Localization, and HttpModules/HttpHandlers all fully support the MVC model.”

So what are we going to lose by going with the new model, and what is it going to take to teach our developers to use it?

If implementing MVC really means just separating code which would previously have gone in a Code-Behind file, using it will be a no-brainer. Lose nothing, but gain easier testing.

By: Rob Conery

Rob Conery — Wed, 12 Dec 2007 18:17:09 +0000

>>Why force them to not use them anymore, if they just want to tidy up their code with a new MVC model<<

I don’t think MS is forcing anyone to do anything to be honest – in fact Scott struck that tone on his first post about it where he states pretty clearly that MVC is an alternative only.

The neat thing is that there are now two ways to work up an app on the MS platform, which is pretty groovy .

And it’s only a CTP right now – hopefully in a few months both MVC and SubSonic will have some very groovy features…